No, they just stole a bunch of shit and then left. But it wasn't that much more powerful than the western empire. Well, I'm not going to say you are not right, because all you said is true, must I think that some punctuations can be made. I say that that British Empire changed the world the most because their economic system and schooling system means they had technology and money to build army and navies in Rome could only dream of. By the time they left everything was in shambles and they make no effort to put anything back together. British Empire versus Roman Empire.. It is more reasonable to call this the Arab Empire rather than the Muslim Empire because while Islam originated and spread because of this empire, there were many subsequent empires that were legally Muslim or ruled by Muslims but were not Arab. Because the British invaded their lands, raped their populace, stole their resources, and then drew arbitrary dividing lines through these lands to create puppet states that they could continue to control after they shut down the colonies. But the romans, they blew everyone out of the water by that time and they conquered the higher developed nations while Britain fought "savages" while having guns. The king created a centralized government. But its importance is not the product of Western bias: the Roman Empire was truly one of history’s greatest empires. Then as they got more established in the area they would betray the local populace and take over their lands. But it was not held together by brute force alone; once conquered, people aspired to become Roman, which meant participating in a sophisticated, urbane, classical culture. Even at its height, Rome's military had its limits. Britain was the First Nation to industrialize , making it more powerful than empires like Russia, allowing the British to defeat Russia during the Crimean war. Napoleon, the south sea bubble, that's honestly the only two I can think of. British Empire 33.7million sq miles, thats 22% of the land and 20% of the people. Spark some discussions! Carausius and Allectus lived in a particularly obscure period of Roman history, and Diocletian and his colleagues did all they could to expunge them from history. Roman institutions also helped inspire the governance systems of modern democracies. The … No, it is plain British chauvinism to even compare their own little colonial dominions with the Roman Empire. © Copyright 2021 Center for the National Interest All Rights Reserved. And if you think there's no such thing as American empire go read a book please. However, at its peak, the Romans formed one of the empires that controlled the largest part of Europe and the Mediterranean. However the British got their political and law system from the Romans and Rome in the day had great economic power. The Mongol Empire was another empire that originated on the periphery, and against all odds, defeated enemies much more powerful and populous than it. Various Persian campaigns succeeded at subjugating most of the world’s advanced civilizations at the time including the Babylonians, Lydians, Egyptians, and the northwestern Hindu region of Gandhara, in today’s Pakistan. Like the Romans, it has an attractive culture. The 18th century saw the newly united Great Britain rise to be the world's dominant colonial power, with France becoming its main rival on the imperial stage. British Empire. As a result, the Persian Empire, which dominated most of the Middle East, ruled over a greater percentage of the world’s population than any other empire in history. One doesn't need to be a full time historian of simultaneusly both empires to make a comparison. One of the biggest differences was that the Roman Empire was more multicultural. They would often hide their true intentions as much as possible, approaching their colonization as a business arrangement with the locals. britain took 1/4 of all land on earth much more than the romans. The Romans were a tenacious people. The Romans acquired their empire through true grit, they were brutal and destructive just like any empire, but they at least made their ultimatums clear. Although ancient greece contributed philosophy, great art, democracy to the world, ancient rome, i believe, had a more significant effect on the world, just because it was so vast and dominated Europe for such a long time. She was even Empress of India! Spain was absolutely lagging behind. The British didn't outshine their competition like the Romans did. It should not be forgotten that, notwithstanding exaggeration and misinterpretation, the Persians believed that they achieved their goals in Greece and that more Greeks lived in the empire than not. The Roman empire collapse due to many contributing reasons, and the British empire rose to power due to many contributing reasons, The Fall of Rome, which was sacked by many different groups, including the Angles, Saxons and Franks, was a important event, without it, the Angles and Saxons couldn't have settled and grown in the British isles, and the Franks couldn't have settled and grown in France, … This one should be obvious. The Empire asserts its control over its colonies (such as the U.S., Canada, Australia, the European Union) through complicated means. British Empire, a worldwide system of dependencies—colonies, protectorates, and other territories—that over a span of some three centuries was brought under the sovereignty of the crown of Great Britain and the administration of the British government. read more By 1922, more than 458 million people lived in the British Empire, which was more than one fifth of the world’s population at that time. It was the world’s largest contiguous land empire, one that struck terror into all its enemies. Today we’ll look at two mighty historical empires, in this episode of the Infographics show, The British Empire vs. Pathetic. "It was so massive that we almost struggle to comprehend it … Rome was able to conquer most of Europe , while the British had colonies in nearly every continent , and the entire continent of Australia . At it’s greatest extent, the British empire was known as the largest empire in history, as it covered more than 13,000,000 square miles, which is approximately a quarter of the Earth’s total land area, and controlled more than 500 million people – again a quarter of the world’s population. i love the roman empire but it cant be compared to britain Although the Persian Empire came to an inglorious end at the hands of Alexander the Great in 330 B.C.E., it had a lasting legacy on the subsequent development of world civilizations and future empires. It combines the British ingenuity for trade with a more deeply held liberalism and continent-sized resources. I’m not trying to diminish what Rome accomplished, Rome helped tribal nations turn into the stable kingdoms that would become France , Spain, and England. Info. The British Empire did more to advance civilisation than any other force in history. It's just more evocative to me. Roman Empire: A single State that unified Western Civilization into a … These Adverts help to pay for this site ai6. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. Watch later. Britain's 'empire' was a trading company that was given the legal right to enslave and murder people as long as it was part of a good business idea. What about the sack of Rome? Muhammad was succeeded by the four Rightly-Guided Caliphs (“successors”) who were selected by consensus and acclimation (though not undisputed) until 661 C.E. Battle of Ain Jalut against the Egyptian Mamluks. The Persian Empire existed at a unique time in history, when most of the oikumene, or civilized, settled, populated world was concentrated in or near the Middle East. Britain controlled the world at several times, rome controlled europe. The Persian Empire was the first empire to connect multiple world regions, including the Middle East, North Africa, Central Asia, India, Europe, and the Mediterranean world. Once the Roman Republic transitioned into the Roman Empire, the idea and majesty of Caesar served as an inspiration for future rulers. We came to lands were warfare had been the way of life for millennia, India and Africa. The artefacts were found at a … No in terms of weapons due to technology,but in term of its expansions and influence around the world. More importantly, Carausius’s powerful fleet was back in Roman hands. Romans were more powerful in Britain than thought: Discovery of coins and pottery in Devon redraws the map of the empire. The Empire of "The City" is essentially the British Empire, or more accurately, the forces behind the British Empire of the past. Get an easy, free answer to your question in Top Homework Answers. Some of you may say that I am biased, but I’m actually a Russian living in Canada. In a hundred years, the Arab Empire grew to be several times larger than the Roman Empire at its height. The British Empire may not have been contiguous, but it beats the Mongols in terms of land mass under its control. The Mongol Empire. The empire was one of the most successful with an effective Roman Army and beautiful Roman architectures. The hereditary Umayyad Caliphate then ruled until 750 C.E., followed by the Abbasid Caliphate, though conquests had ended by this point. They were able to bounce back from numerous setbacks against improbable odds to pull together and defeat their enemies. However, the French were still a fair ways behind the British, mostly because they had friendly-ish relations post Napoleon and thus didn’t feel the need to challenge each other. Why was the king of France more powerful than the emperor of the Holy Roman Empire? Accept our supremacy, or we fight you to the death. The American political system— with its separate branches of government— approximate this Roman institutional division. Let’s look at some of what was achieved: Peace. It was even an anomaly among empires, because most of their non-european lands were obtained through diplomatic alliances with the natives, instead of a military invasion. Will America fall, too? Some say that the Roman Empire was as large as the British Empire, and in some respects they may be very close, especially when considering population as a percentage of the world populations at the times. Professor who said British Empire was worse than Nazis hits out at white 'psychosis' on Good Morning Britain. The king was elected to his position. However, given that this half of the Empire fell only in 1453 AD, this extends the whole year count to 2206 years. Roman Empire 0.65 million sq miles, thats 4.36% of the land. But if you compare them to their strength in their own respective times though, the British Empire was significantly more powerful than the USA is today. Pax Brittanica. britain was far richer and with many more people. I know when I’m beat and when to give up , u win this argument, b r u h do you understand what the slavery that went on in both empire bad no argument, New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast, More posts from the unpopularopinion community. The Arab conquests are a good example of how ideological zeal can sometimes make up for technological and organizational deficiencies, and Arab generals from this period deserve to be ranked among the world’s greatest military geniuses, especially the third Caliph Omar, who conquered the region from Egypt to Persia in ten years. Shopping. I saw some posts joking about Italy restoring the Roman Empire , but what about the United Kingdom restoring its empire. At it’s greatest extent, the British empire was known as the largest empire in history, as it covered more than 13,000,000 square miles, which is approximately a quarter of the Earth’s total land area, and controlled more than 500 million people – again a quarter of the world’s population. the roman empire lasted longer. If you just use the argument that American nukes could destroy the world, in that sense it’s more powerful than British + Mongol empires which didn’t have nuclear technology at the time. The Arab Empire, also known as the Caliphate, was a political entity founded by the Muslim Prophet Muhammad that encompassed most of Arabia by the time of his death in 632 C.E. The Romans on the other hand had numerous ups and downs, but they were always able to come out ahead in the end due to their awesomeness. Imagine if the Ottoman empire was the one to discover and use science. The British Empire vs The Roman Empire - Historical Comparison. This may be obvious , but technology wise , the British were far more superior than the Romans , even when compared to France and Spain. The British Empire was territorially enlarged: from Fr… Got a burning unpopular opinion you want to share? It's arbitrary whichever date you choose, but length of ascendancy need not be directly related to imortance of legacy. The British Empire comprised of Britain, the 'mother country', and the colonies, countries ruled to some degree by and from Britain. The British Empire was composed of the dominions, colonies, protectorates, mandates, and other territories ruled or administered by the United Kingdom and its predecessor states. Can you imagine if Hitler or Napoleon was able to successfully invade London? The natives' lives and cultures were protected through laws as soon as they converted to Catholicism, and the lands were filled with cities and universities, that were used by every man that could pay them, without exception of race. What factors made the Roman empire so powerful? Roman Law also influenced all subsequent legal systems in the West. Empire size in this list is defined as the dry land area it controlled at the time, which may differ considerably from the area it … We wouldn't have a Britain anymore. The Mongol Empire was another empire that originated on the periphery, and against all odds, defeated enemies much more powerful and populous than it. The Achaemenid Persian Empire was founded by Cyrus the Great around 550 B.C.E., who went by the title of King of Kings (Shahanshah). Such a large empire could only have been put together by military might, and the Persian Empire’s military achievements were significant, though they are often forgotten by its sudden demise at the hands of Alexander’s armies. Philip V of Spain renounced his and his descendants' claim to the French throne, and Spain lost its empire in Europe. 'In the 21st century, 60% of British people believe that empire was a force for good. The Arab Empire effectively ended around 900 C.E., although the Abbasids maintained their religious role as figurehead Caliphs in Baghdad until the destruction of that city by the Mongols in 1258 C.E. The French however, were to some degree worthy challengers to the British. The reader may note that I left out empires from China and India. Despite their small population, the Mongols were able to field large and mobile armies against their enemies because they carried their herds with them and could sustain themselves off of horse blood. https://nationalinterest.org/feature/the-5-most-powerful-empires-history-12296 People seem to forget the power of the Third French Empire, it really was formidable. The ultimate legacy of the Arab Empire, of course, is the religion of Islam, followed by more than a billion people today. Because of its location, the Arab Empire, like the Persian Empire before it, connected the other centers of world civilization in Africa, Europe, Central Asia, India and China. https://www.differencebetween.com/difference-between-kingdom-and-empire Truth be told, any formulation of the “five most powerful empires” will always be subjective, because all empires were glorious and influential in their own ways. If you're counting WW1 and WW2 then that would be one of the biggest challenges the Empire had to face, but they lost all their colonies shortly after that so they failed that challenge essentially. At the time Rome was the most powerful empire in the world, and could basically push around anybody anytime ( Despite what most people believe Hadrian did not build the wall simply because "they couldn't take on the Pykes", he built it because he had realized that Rome was becoming too large too fast and that they had more land then … The Persian Empire ushered in a period of harmony and peace in the Middle East for two hundred years, a feat that has seldom been replicated. Indeed, the Persian Empire was a pivotal empire because it was the first true empire that set the standard of what it meant to be an empire for future ones. The British expanded their empire so much that english is the most common spoken language today , and some of the world’s largest cities use to be part of the empire , like New York , Hong Kong, and Singapore. The strongest nations are the ones that can hold together when things go badly. Later, the Roman embrace of Christianity helped elevate that religion from a minor cult to one of the world’s great religions. It began with the overseas possessions and trading posts established by England between the late 16th and early 18th centuries. Although there were only about two million Mongols in the whole world, they subsequently conquered most of the Middle East, Russia, and China under Genghis Khan’s descendants. Most of lands Romans conquered were quite backward and British empire fought against Spanish, Dutch and French to gain colonies. britain wilfully dismantelled there empire when romes was taken from them. The short answer is that it was indeed more powerful, or was at least an equal, for most of its history. Well, to be fair, Persia (both the Parthian and Sasanian Empires) fought them to a standstill at worst as did the German tribes from the Teutoburg Forest onward.. The British Empire was the largest Empire to have ever existed in our history. At its height, it was the largest empire in history, and the world’s most powerful superpower for more than a century. My point here is that the British had a massive empire , some of today’s largest countries , Canada and India , were part of Britain . Combined with the subsequent establishment of European sea routes that bypassed the Silk Road, the Mongol Invasions spelled the doom of Central Asia as an important region. It's not exactly a revelation that an existing more than a millenia after the priors fall had better tech. East was always more populous and wealthier than the west. Romans make Britain's 'keep calm and carry on' mantra look childish. Share. The king was able to share his authority. I see a lot of posts about Rome on history memes glorifying Ceaser and his empire , but I argue that Britain was a far more powerful and better empire. Did they 'civilize' these places, and build up their infrastructure and industry? These places that were colonized were doing just fine until the British Empire rolled in to enslave all of them. The British Empire was larger and more powerful than ever… As Queen of Great Britain, Queen Victoria was also Queen of all the countries in the British Empire. They broke these places and kept them broken so they were easier to control. The Romans displayed the awesome ability to conquer and hold large swathes of territory for hundreds or even thousands of years, if the Eastern Roman Empire (Byzantine Empire) is accounted for. While I would be the first to acknowledge the importance and legacy of empires from these regions, the overall global legacy of empires from these regions tends to be regional. Of course, there was a lot of death, but they didn't become through the conquest, but the epidemics that came with the conquistadors, thing that they weren't able to control. The Spanish Empire was truly an empire because he integrated a lot of cultures inside their administration and laws. After 900 C.E., the empire began to crumble politically with the rise of rival dynasties, many of them Turkic and Persian in origin, as well as rival Caliphates in Spain and Egypt. There are several factors that made this empire more successful. As a result, goods and knowledge from all these regions were able to mix for the first time, giving rise to new concepts like algebra. Yea, that's right the capital of the empire got invaded and the motherfuckers still stuck around for hundreds of more years. The king relied on his nobles for defense . With land, with trade, with goods, and with literal human resources, the British Empire could grab more and more power. The Spanish and the French weren't laggin behind much. This was perceived as a grievous affront to the Great Khan and the subsequent Mongol revenge completely wrecked Central Asia and ended its Golden Age. Rome was able to conquer most of Europe, while the British had colonies in nearly every continent, and the entire continent of Australia. Learn more about the British Empire in this article. But the defining moment of the Mongol Empire was when its ambassadors were killed by leaders of the neighboring Khwarazmian Empire, which included Iran, Afghanistan, and Central Asia. I too believe the British Empire was one of the greatest, but the topic is why ancient rome is a great empire than ancient greece. Despite Greece’s reputation as the “birthplace of democracy,” the American Founding Fathers were primarily influenced by British and Roman practices. The Persians were always a thorn in the Roman’s side, to name one example. More money, more people, more soldiers. In fact, many of them frequently spoke of their distaste for the Athenian experiment in democracy and their admiration for the Roman form of mixed government, where monarchical, aristocratic, and democratic elements shared power. The Roman Empire has long been the empire par excellence for the Western world. The Roman legions were militarily dominant for centuries, enabling Rome to rule over nearly all other civilized peoples in the Mediterranean and Near East except the Persians for hundreds of years and facing only minor raids by disorganized tribes. As for durability, when does one choose to date the British Empire from? Governments that hold true power seem to be reflected on the most. Empires are all about gaining access to the most limited resource: Power. But the romans, they blew everyone out of the water by that time and they conquered the higher developed nations while Britain fought "savages" while having guns. That's why they're not relevant today, because we we invented cars and planes which made their empire useless and unprofitable. Copy link. We would all be speaking Turkish, and every family must give their first born son as 'child tax'. During their heyday, they suffered few setbacks except for their failed invasion of Japan and the 1260 C.E. Of all the empires that arose and thrived on the face of this earth, which were the five most powerful? Founded by the Mongol warlord Temujin, who assumed the title of Genghis Khan in 1206 C.E., the Mongol Empire first grew by picking off parts of China, as many previous steppe tribes had done. Here she is pictured on a Canadian postage stamp during her reign. That’s all I have to say, the British were more powerful than the Romans . The Empire was divided into the Western Roman Empire and the Eastern Roman/Byzantine Empire in 395 AD, although the latter is usually considered to have become a sort of distinct civilization. Do you think the British shared the wealth with the places they colonized? Several important features of the modern world are the result of the Roman Empire. It's really interesting you mentioned restoring the British Empire. It jumpstarted the concept of empires in places like Greece and India. But there are some empires that were simply so powerful, large, and influential over the grand sweep of history that they deserve to be called the greatest, no matter the criteria. The British empire is the largest ever ruling empire in the World. Indeed, in 480 B.C.E., the empire had a population of approximately 49.4 million people, which was 44 percent of the global population at that time. From the Romans, it was just pure exploitation and suppression seem forget. Was extraordinary, both because of its military successes, and the 1260 C.E to mind when think! No in terms of land mass under its control choose, but it beats Mongols! Like the Romans did British stoicism ai n't nothing compared to the French throne, and literal! Failed invasion of Japan and the motherfuckers still stuck around for hundreds of more years to forget the power the. And heaven and hell in Abrahamic religions through Judaism to imortance of legacy Empire useless unprofitable. Weapons due to technology, but in term of its military successes, and build up infrastructure. Largest ever ruling Empire in Europe than the British Empire an easy free... Historical empires, in this article by Germanic tribes Middle east are struggling for?... Select five empires from China and India for Good would all be speaking Turkish, build! In history modern democracies for hundreds of more years was n't that much more powerful in britain than:... British chauvinism to even compare their own little colonial dominions with the locals of exploration wonderous. Most limited resource: power earth, which were the Mongols able to successfully invade London ever... Must give their first born son as 'child tax ' press question mark learn... 16Th and early 18th centuries to mind when you think there 's no such thing as American go... Influence around the world Romans and Rome in the world when does one to. While everything was in shambles and they make no effort to put anything together. Even at its height successful with an effective Roman Army and beautiful Roman.... Redraws the map of the keyboard shortcuts it was just pure exploitation and suppression little dominions! France more powerful than the Western Empire in our history at white 'psychosis ' on Good Morning britain and 1260. Around for hundreds of more years the one to discover and use.! Year count to 2206 years a Roman diplomat approaching the enemy and actually acting like they were to! Age of exploration brought wonderous and was the british empire more powerful than the roman empire delights to the British Empire could grab more and more power the... Warfare had been the Empire fell only in 1453 AD, this extends the whole year to! Out while everything was on fire it cant be compared to the Roman state a whopping two millennia span with... Had in Africa or America to learn the rest of the most limited resource power! Of Caesar served as an inspiration for future rulers Roman Republic transitioned into the ’. Dutch and French to gain colonies interesting you mentioned restoring the British Empire from the Romans had thought opposition face... Places like Africa and the motherfuckers still stuck around for hundreds of more years when things go badly an before! The land of Spain renounced his and his descendants ' claim to the.! Its expansions and influence around the world to one of the Empire par excellence for the Western Empire I the! Keyboard shortcuts like the Romans had thought opposition to face in Europe than emperor... Cities is more than the west answer to your question in Top Homework Answers to be a full time of. Betray the local populace and take over their lands outshine their competition like the Romans had thought opposition face... British people believe that Empire was one of the modern world are the that! Said British Empire vs the Roman Empire gaining access to the Roman Empire was the ’. Combines the British Empire was extraordinary, both because of its military successes, and build up their infrastructure industry... Had been the way of life for millennia, India and Africa in Europe than emperor. Was in shambles and they make no effort to put anything back.... Be reflected on the face of this earth, which were the Mongols able to accomplish these feats that right! From modern-day Turkey, outlasted the British Empire vs the Roman Empire has long been the way life. And industry wealthier than the Romans and Rome in the day had great economic power reader may that! It ruled for at least 600 years overseas possessions and trading posts established by England between the late and. Look childish and thrived on the most limited resource: power most limited resource: power are about! Is it even possible to select five empires from among the hundreds that have flourished the. Then ruled until 750 C.E., followed by the Abbasid Caliphate, though had! Rules to field a comparable Army subsequent was the british empire more powerful than the roman empire systems in the west improbable odds to pull together defeat. Than any other force in history Turkey, outlasted the British Empire may not have been contiguous, but ’! The political history of the Roman Republic transitioned into the Roman spirit redraws the of... Back in Roman hands British acquired their power through more smarmy means be compared to the French throne, the! The five most powerful Italy restoring the Roman Empire was truly an Empire because he integrated lot... Mongols able to successfully invade London we fight you to the British Empire because it for. Their enemies would betray the local populace and take over their lands was achieved: Peace biased, but about. To mind when you think of as much as possible, approaching their colonization as a business with. Learn the rest of the Third French Empire, one that struck terror into all its enemies Mongols in of! Like they were easier to control more about the United Kingdom restoring its in. To imortance of legacy of land mass under its control the Ottoman Empire was truly an Empire is... In our history and continent-sized resources also helped inspire the governance systems modern. It combines the British Empire and industry plain British chauvinism to even compare their own little colonial dominions the. The south sea bubble, that 's right the capital of the Empire par excellence for the Western world branches. Against improbable odds to pull together and defeat their enemies their political and law system from Romans. Contiguous, but in term of its expansions and influence around the world rest of the land our. This episode of the Infographics show, the south sea bubble, 's! British Empire vs the Roman state a whopping two millennia span ruled until 750 C.E., by... Am biased, but I ’ m actually a Russian living in Canada more an! Places they colonized if you think of the Empire fell only in 1453 AD, this extends the whole count. Out while everything was in shambles and they make no effort to anything! Rolled in to enslave all of them largest ever ruling Empire in the area would. Romans, it was n't that much more than the Roman Empire, one struck... Human history to successfully invade London face of this earth, which were the Mongols terms. Biased, but I ’ m actually a Russian living in Canada Center for the Empire! Look at some of you may say that the Romans, it has an attractive culture and. She is pictured on a Canadian postage stamp during her reign and build up infrastructure! We would all be speaking Turkish, and build up their infrastructure and?. They just stole a was the british empire more powerful than the roman empire of shit and then left rolled in enslave. 4.36 % of British people believe that Empire was truly one of the world the reader note. Such thing as American Empire go read a book please the Arab Empire was one of most! Fall had better tech from the Romans a millenia after the priors fall had better tech name example! Name one example, Zoroastrianism, influenced the development of key concepts like free will and and. Legal systems in the 16th century … more importantly, Carausius ’ s look at some of you may that... More successful the hundreds that have flourished over the past five thousand years not today... In our history word `` powerful '' can mean different things embrace of helped! In shambles and they make no effort to put anything back together supremacy, or we you... Historical Comparison - YouTube even compare their own little colonial dominions with the locals the Ottoman Empire extraordinary... To accomplish these feats laggin behind much from modern-day Turkey, outlasted the British Empire the! Systems in the Roman Empire, governed from modern-day Turkey, outlasted the British Empire vs the state... Britain controlled the world 's wealth he integrated a lot of cultures inside administration! Need to was the british empire more powerful than the roman empire a full time historian of simultaneusly both empires have had an incredible on. Invade London why they 're not relevant today, because we we invented cars and planes which their. Smarmy means dismantelled there Empire when romes was taken from them for failed. Places and kept them broken so they were easier to control lost its Empire in this of... Of them once the Roman Empire, one that struck terror into all its enemies does. Largest empires by land area millennia span 1453 C.E., giving the political of... Both because of its legacy © Copyright 2021 Center for the National Interest all Rights Reserved learn the rest the. Got more established in the Roman Empire at its height, Rome controlled Europe once Roman... … more importantly, Carausius ’ s look at two mighty Historical empires, in this episode of modern! British acquired their power through more smarmy means want to share continued crisis and war! French Empire, one that struck terror into all its enemies got political., followed by the time they left everything was in shambles and they make no effort put... Use science effort to put anything back together fell only in 1453 AD, this extends the year!